When will we stop treating problems in reverse by putting plaster on a wooden leg.
In France we made a specialty in systematically hiding key issues, those related to our approach to society.
Parents systematically incompetent reject their responsibilities on the community.
Initially it should better manage the number of children that are desired, "family planning" does exist ...
Although many parents "responsible" decide according to their income and the train life they want, many kids are counting on the aid community, as in underdeveloped countries.
This applies both financially and in terms of education.
remedies skid more by always using the same social slices, those who are allegedly « privilégiés ».
On parle souvent d’enfants « défavorisés », tout en omettant d’évoquer pourquoi ils sont « défavorisés ».
Le plus souvent leurs situations sont liées à l’incompétence, la fainéantise, l’égoïsme, le manque de réalisme ou le manque d’éducation des parents eux-mêmes.
Il faut arrêter de faire du misérabilisme qui ne fait qu’encourager ces états de faits en les entérinant et donc en les perdurant sempiternellement.
Il conviendrait donc avant tout d’éduquer les parents…
But the urgency, of course, is to rescue these children "disadvantaged," including by providing access to sporting activities which can not be denied educational values (when they do not slip around only a buck ...) .
A sports association consists of members who pay a fee to engage in an activity they have chosen.
Its contribution is supposed to have been fairly established to cover the running costs of the chosen discipline.
Let us not sing that everyone has to register in a sports multisport bearing in mind that it is simultaneously a humanitarian or civic!
Moreover, it is careful not to let him know that a portion of the premium will actually equip unidentified exercising perhaps another subject, because they have been considered (by whom?) That if they were part of "needy".
The principle of benefiting as many of their low fees, however, is a laudable principle.
Charging full price for some members to benefit others who are less fortunate (including carrying out other activities) is more questionable, even if the principle put forward, that of brotherhood, equality is attractive.
Because the basis on which tariff reductions are they established: Tax? income? why the "lifestyle" is it ever considered?
In addition, activities not all the same cost: the equipment is very variable, sports facilities more or less expensive, the costs of competitions are very different.
As in all areas, there are families who can manage reasonable according to their budgets and other spending that start with as they wish and then call the company or communities to do the welding end of the month .
We can not be shocked to find that many families "rescued by the community" are equipped with the latest hardware, the latest model of TV in vogue, that each child has its portable subscription that the vehicle family is not necessarily an economic model, etc.. ... to evoke the more apparent.
So stop the waffle political hypocrites who deceive the idiots.
This type of speech is only there to collect tracks for the upcoming elections.
True solidarity should be a better pay scale, as in some Nordic countries.
This would reduce dependency, develop a "consumption" and everyone would be happier, including our real "political."
But the thirst for power (which many are dressed politicos) would lose a part of their ego, so the inequality will still continue for a long time and that companies will always have their eternal "assisted" the other side and their "eternal cows".
0 comments:
Post a Comment